ArchivedAuthenticityneohuman wrote:then please explane the fiscist (sic) italy under mussilinni (sic) during 1912, he used the roman catholic church as his own personal spys (sic),
what does the bible teach, peace and forgiveness(noble trates (sic)), but when used in mass by a dictator, then that form of subservence (sic) caused his rise to power.
there are still alot (sic) of unacounted (sic) books of the bible that are out there, with links to the bible.
God gave man a choice, and hasent (sic) taken it away yet, not with adam eatting (sic) the forbidden fruit, not with the cursifiction (sic) of christ, not with world war one or two, god has given use (sic) the bible. we can change it, or alter it or do whatever. it all depends if we listion (sic) and learn, and explore, and use our choice to to do anything, even as damming (sic) as alter the bible.
The post you're responding to states that anything could be a part of God's divine plan. It is, of course, an indefensible position, and one the poster contradicts him/herself. (S)he also claims that the dead sea scrolls prove the authenticity of the Bible, which is a statement in which I cannot find any logical connection. That should not be interpreted as a flame but as a admission of outright bafflement.
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |