btw, some other usefull information for you.
Evolution theory by Charles Darwin is hinduistic in origin.
Darwins grandpa, Erasmus Darwin, made a sort of origin of life book based on the hindustic belief on progression of the souls(reincranation), only difference between Erasmus and Charles was that Erasmus kept the bible with it, and Charles was fed up with faith so he wrote his own copy without the bible.
So in theory, you're a hindu *grin* hiya hindu follower, how are you *Laughs his head off* soz, I'm in a humourous mood.
And, where is alllll the scientific proof of your claims of evolution?
Carbon dating? radio active parts dating?
Do you know that with radio active parts dating, something of 20 years ago was dated 3.000.000 years ago?
or with Carbon dating, something of a 1.000.000 years ago was dated 1820 years ago?
The radioactive dating is falty becouse with current time society, radiactivity practically bombards the earth and pollutes it.
Becouse of our pollution, the ozon layer has degraded, thusly opening up for outerspace radiactive rays(btw, chances of an ozon layer? )
And even if the ozon layer wasn't degraded, There are still Solar flares(like the one that coused the great aurora borealis last year in the NL) that change radiation levels desperately.
So radiation dating is out of the question.
Carbon dating, it calculates how much C-14 molucules is in an object against C-12 molecules...
This dating method assumes that C-14 and C-12 levels are always constant... To bad that's not the fact, again, modern pollution, but if we keep that out, we still have volcanic eruptions incresing the level of C-14 desperately thusly throwing offtrack the dating really
Even bushfires change these levels enough to make a difference of a couple of thousand to a couple of million years....
Or of course, you always have the sediment layers to date something right? To bad this is faulty too.... you always have earthquakes, mudslides, floods, tidal waves, sand storms, etc.. etc.. etc.. etc... which doesn't allow slow buildup of layers of earth. So this can't be used for accurate dating either....
Do you know that they won't even carbon date something if you don't tell in which sediment layer you found it? *grin*
Nice theories, but that's all they are really...
Going back to radiactive dating, items have been dated for millions of years ago... an example date of a radiactive dating:
The object is 165 to 3 million years old....
Humans, thought to be only existant to up to bout 40-60.000 years ago(that's our alleged evolving time) have also been existant 3 million years ago(hurray, we survived )
Kinda incredible isn't it?
And according to evolution, all things change over time.
How can it be then, that a praying mantis of "4 million" years ago, still looks exactly the same as the praying mantis today?
or the ant of "5 million" years ago looks the same as the ant today?
or a musketo of "3 million" years ago is still the same as todays?
Awaiting your answer *griN*
Got way more in store *grin*
I love having the Holy Spirit, it's fun writing posts with it *shouts of joy with an idiotic grin on his face(hey, you know me *grin*)*