Well, first of all, none of them are questionable for the simple reason that those pagan religions existed around the time of Jesus, before him, and after him. We do not deny that Jesus was prophecised in the OT. Some of them are true and some are false just like I indicated above.
So basically, the idea of redemption, crucifiction, son of god, all are not new or unique at all. It's what you added to the Jewish faith that made your religion Pagan.
Also, Jesus teaches us to be more righteous than the pagans.
Of ourse he does, but it's the people after him that corrupted his message.
Also, Christianity was not compatable with the Roman empire, or any of it's pagan religions or mystery cults.
Indeed they were, look at the refernce to the Pagan religions above. Everything you do as a christian or in better term "triniterian" is derived from those pagans.
And you should be the last to accuse any religion of paganism, every time you pray to your god you bow towards a pagan shrine housing an accursed pagan sacred stone.
And why don't you read the OT and see that alot of prophets kissed stuff and made alters and shrines?
What ever the case,
LOL I just showed you that Matthew misquoted the OT and made a mistake and you say whatever the case? You just can't admit he made a mistake right?....lol
Take a look at this:
That is DIONYSIUS and the story behind him is :
(c) DIONYSIUS or BACCHUS of Greece:
1) Was termed the only begotten son of Jupitor.
2) Was born to a virgin mother on December 25th.
3) Was called the redeemer and savior.
4) He called himself the Alpha and the Omega.
5) The story of his passion was celebrated every year, and it similarly consisted in death, descent into hell and resurrection.
Kinda amazing..huh?
And of course you can't answer the other false prophecies that I indicated above.
Want some more?
You have corrupted the Jewish religion, made God into three and made up things that were not known to the Jewish people. You say you follow the God of Abraham but as a matter of fact you followed him but gave him a son. You made God look so weak dying and suffering.
The Qumran scrolls are quite accurate with the oldest scriptures dated from the 2nd century BC. Almost all of the Old Testament scriptures were found among the Qumran scrolls.
The QUmran scrolls are OT scrolls. One thing your beloved christians scholars fail to tell you that they are not similar in text to the OT in hand nowadays, they do have the same meaning but the text isn't the same. So as we can see this proves that if those scrolls were the word of God then the current OT isn't the word of God and vice versa. My point here is that if the word of God is not copied word to word then whatever you copied is false, and the Qumran scrolls demonstrate that.
These ancient scriptures were translated and compared to Bibles that were copied and rewritten since the Vulgate and were found to be amazingly uncorrupted through the centuries. Only a few minor mistranslations were found
Again, your christian scholars fail to tell you the truth about your NT scripture.Here is how your oldest scriptures look like:
The Schofeild Bible's (1998 ed) footnote for this passage gives us the answer: "Verses 9-20 are not found in the two most ancient mss., the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. . ." They are claimed to be very relieble, but are they?
Sinaticus and Vaticanus disagree with about 90-95% of all known manuscripts, and they even disagree among themselves. Both have a long history of corruption and obscurity.
Omissions of Sinaticus and Vaticanus
Vaticanus omits:
a.) Everything from Genesis 1:1 to 46:28.
b.) Psalms 106-139
c.) All of First Timothy
d.) All of second Timothy
e.) All Titus
f.) All of Revelation
g.) All of Hebrews after Chapter 9:14 to the end of the book
h.) Our Lord's agony and blood like sweat in the Garden of Gethsemane. Luke 22:43- 44
i.) Our Lord's prayer for his adversaries. Luke 23:34 "Father forgive them; for they know not what they do."
j.) Mark 16:9-20. There is a significant blank space in the manuscript where this passage would have gone, testifying for it's inclusion in the Bible.
k.) The story of the women taken in adultery John 7:53 - John 8:11"
l.) Heb 9:15 to the end of the book.
m.) 2 Kings 2:5-7, 10-13
Vaticanus adds the Apocrypha to the OT.
Sinaticus omits:
a.) John 5:4, 8:1-11
b.) Matthew 16:2-3
c.) Romans 16:24
d.) Mark 16:9-20 Again, there is a significant blank space where these verses should have gone.
e.) Acts 8:37
f.) 1 John 5:7
Sinaticus adds: The Epistle of Barnabas and The Shepherd of Hermas to the NT and the Apocypha to the OT.
Corrections of Sinaticus and Vaticanus
Sinaticus was corrected at least 15,000 times by multiple correctors. Most of these corrections were made in the seventh century, but some of these corrections were made as late as the twelfth century. (Sure sounds like the "oldest" reading, doesn't it?) The writing quality is very poor; many times words or whole phrases are repeated in succession. The original writing is completely written over in parts, and the original writer even corrected some of his mistakes. Vaticanus also shows very sloppy penmanship
That is aside from the mistransalted verses, such as PSALM 22. I have checked the Arabic bible and it doesn't even say it the way your sources say it. Wanna know how to translate Psalm22?
Here is what your accurate KJV say:
For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me:
they pierced my hands and my feet.
Well other sources translated accurately doesn't even come close:
For dogs have encompassed me; a company of evil-doers have inclosed me; like a lion,
they are at my hands and my feet.
1917 Jewish Publication Society Bible
Many dogs surround me; a pack of evildoers closes in on me.
So wasted are my hands and feet
NAB
This Psalm is about David when his son rebelled against him. For centuries the Jews knew that and suddenly the whole passsage is not about David.
However, clear proof is presented above that Christianity is not a unique religion. Everything has been borrowed. Whenever the first conference was made, tha Roman pagan emperor wanted to combine all Roman religions into one, and he did, that's why the real Christians left the council in DISGUST. That is why all Hebrew bible, Aramaic Bibles were all burned and only translated copies from the original were kept. They were also chosen from 22,000 documents.
I call this:
DENIAL