LOL, the funny thing is, everything "oneGOD" said was just made up. There are all these different stories on Christ to support the fact that he was not crucified for our sins, and there is no proof to all those stories whatsoever
The fact that you ignore to think it may be true is that they might have thought they crucified him. Nothing is made up, those religions existed at the time of christ, the time before christ, and the time after christ. You see the similarities, you know something is up, no one can just ignore it.
I just showed you the crucified DIONYSIUS and many other examples, you CAN NOT deny the similarities at all. GO look through it again and you'll see eventhough I doubt it.
If you say Christianity is a pagan religion, then I will just say that the Allah of Islam is the pagan moon god and we can go back and forth
You can not say that for the simple fact that the Quran put down all those pagan gods of arabia including the moon god. Muhammad when he entered Mecca destroyed all the idols. One more fact that you choose to ignore is that you like to forget why Muhammad left Mecca in the first place, is it not he bashed on all of their gods? YES. Then how can Muhammad be a moon god worshipper. On the other hand, when we look at the amazing similarities of the new introduced concepts into the Jewish faith, we will completely understand why the Jews rejected the christian faith and regard it as pagan.
And why do you keep mentioning that Christians worship 3 gods?
I don't believe I said that, I said three persons of god.
Jeremiah" was the name of a larger grouping of the Hebrew Scriptures which contained both Jeremiah and Zechariah
That is not true, because the canon was done many years ahead of Jesus, and each book was distinct. for example, the QUmran scrolls maintained al of these books and distinguished them.
Instead of making blind statements AGAINST a religion on matters you don't know of and no one knows of, why don't you just use the common sense which God gave you. This includes God's truth is to be first revealed then the false revelations come. That is theology 101 right there.
AS a matter of fact, common sense says that when someone read the OT and then read what people after Jesus did you will find no connection, apart of mistranslated verses which have been shown on so many occasions one can see that most of the ten commandments have been broken including "NO IMAGES OF GOD" which can be seen in every church these days. We see how Jesus says :" follow the law" and then we see others saying: no don't follow the law. We see how Jesus is called the servant of God and then we see how others say that God (Jesus) made himself so weak on earth just to save us. totally two contridictory doctrines. The mighty God of the OT is the servant God who was bashed by the disbelievers who he killed over and over in the OT. That's the common sense you refuse to look for, common sense tells you that a dying cruficied god is not unique, common sense tells you that christmas and easter were celebrated, common sense tells you that eating whine and bread is not new, and common sense tells you that those introduced conepts which never existed in the OT should not even exist. It is simply man made.
If you are a Muslim, then Christians do not have to prove to you that the doctrine of Christianity before Muhammed is the same doctrine we have today. If it is not the same, then why did Muhammed have to "correct" Christianity in the first place?
Here is your answer:
[3] Never would a human being whom GOD blessed with the scripture and prophethood say to the people, "Idolize me beside GOD." Instead, (he would say), "Devote yourselves absolutely to your Lord alone," according to the scripture you preach and the teachings you learn.
[5] GOD will say, "O Jesus, son of Mary, did you say to the people, `Make me and my mother idols beside GOD?' " He will say, "Be You glorified. I could not utter what was not right. Had I said it, You already would have known it. You know my thoughts, and I do not know Your thoughts. You know all the secrets.
Also, we do have the original scriptures:
I will repeat myself again:
Again, your christian scholars fail to tell you the truth about your NT scripture.Here is how your oldest scriptures look like:
Quote:
The Schofeild Bible's (1998 ed) footnote for this passage gives us the answer: "Verses 9-20 are not found in the two most ancient mss., the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. . ." They are claimed to be very relieble, but are they?
Sinaticus and Vaticanus disagree with about 90-95% of all known manuscripts, and they even disagree among themselves. Both have a long history of corruption and obscurity.
Omissions of Sinaticus and Vaticanus
Vaticanus omits:
a.) Everything from Genesis 1:1 to 46:28.
b.) Psalms 106-139
c.) All of First Timothy
d.) All of second Timothy
e.) All Titus
f.) All of Revelation
g.) All of Hebrews after Chapter 9:14 to the end of the book
h.) Our Lord's agony and blood like sweat in the Garden of Gethsemane. Luke 22:43- 44
i.) Our Lord's prayer for his adversaries. Luke 23:34 "Father forgive them; for they know not what they do."
j.) Mark 16:9-20. There is a significant blank space in the manuscript where this passage would have gone, testifying for it's inclusion in the Bible.
k.) The story of the women taken in adultery John 7:53 - John 8:11"
l.) Heb 9:15 to the end of the book.
m.) 2 Kings 2:5-7, 10-13
Vaticanus adds the Apocrypha to the OT.
Sinaticus omits:
a.) John 5:4, 8:1-11
b.) Matthew 16:2-3
c.) Romans 16:24
d.) Mark 16:9-20 Again, there is a significant blank space where these verses should have gone.
e.) Acts 8:37
f.) 1 John 5:7
Sinaticus adds: The Epistle of Barnabas and The Shepherd of Hermas to the NT and the Apocypha to the OT.
Corrections of Sinaticus and Vaticanus
Sinaticus was corrected at least 15,000 times by multiple correctors. Most of these corrections were made in the seventh century, but some of these corrections were made as late as the twelfth century. (Sure sounds like the "oldest" reading, doesn't it?) The writing quality is very poor; many times words or whole phrases are repeated in succession. The original writing is completely written over in parts, and the original writer even corrected some of his mistakes. Vaticanus also shows very sloppy penmanship
Hebrew bible, Aramaic Bibles were all burned and only translated copies from the original were kept. They were also chosen from 22,000 documents.
and these two references are already mentioned in your link. Besides, you know only have a translation, that's about it.