Homosexual Discussion ForumHomosexuality in NatureI can agree with this statement, however, do the 3% have the right to force their philosophy on the other 97% in the name of diversity? Do the 3% have the right to use a psuedo-science to back their progaganda to the exclusion of dissenting voices, no matter how small within the ranks of that profession? Dr. Spitzer a former supported of the gay community's stance change is impossible has changed his stance, and there are a number of well qualified mental health professionals who agree with Dr. Spitzer. Does that profession have the right to attempt to quench any disagreement among their own ranks? There are forces working with psychiatry and psychology that deny the truth in the name of professional pride more than honest research. All you have to do to understand this is read what Dr. Spitzer's peers had to say about him after he announced his shift in position. It was not pretty. Gays have gained philosophical control over many organization including the National Education Association. This has enabled them to gain access to this nations children and with the cooperation of the ACLU has kept an alternate philosophy out of the debate. Just how do you expect people dealing with a lifestyle to understand all the positions if you keep one side of the issue silenced by misuse of professional organizations who duty and purpose is to educate our children? Education is not indoctrination. However, from the looks of things the NEA has at last recongnized their error (see National Education Association Recognizes Ex-Gay Educators Caucus). However, time will tell if this new enlightened approach to a controversial issue will spill over into the other organizations that are so adamant is supporting only gay activists. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame