quote:
"Even if Mike was contradicting himself, you will have to excuse him seeing that science accepts contradictions according to Jovaro. So adhereing to that logic, you complaining to Mike on his unclear statements is unscientific."
Hello! I am not Jovaro. Whatever he says should not necessarily bind me in the same way that whatever a creationist say in this thread should not bind other creationists. That is a very lousy way of debating. This is simply preposterous!
quote:
"How can you explain my reasoning when you are making quotes that I never said? I never said, "God exists because the bible says so. I believe the bible because it is the word of God." And if I did, it clearly would be taken out of context by making it seem I have blind faith. Before starting arguments on complexities such as "Circulo Probando" one should learn the basics of writing, such as how to not put words in people's mouth."
Good grief! Can you stop for a second and try to grasp what you're trying to say. You are the one putting words into my mouth. I never said that you claimed "God exists because the bible says so.....", I was merely using it as an analogy to illustrate the kind of argument you're making. Let me refresh your memory of what I said "Let me illustrate how faulty your reasoning is......". I hope, by now, you should realize how unfounded your accusation had been.