Would you care to provide some thorough evidence that the KJV translation have left out 2 chapters from Daniel etc etc?
Some thorough detailed information on this would be nice to see. Also ... because a translation MAY be corrupt, does not make a valid or logical argument to say the Bible is corrupt, want to know why? Because the Manuscripts are still unchanged
If a translation is wrong/changed/altered/corrupted etc ... That does not mean the Manuscript is bad, it means the translation is bad, hence ... the Bible in itself is not corrupt, just a bad translation.
However, many lives and time was spent into translating the KJV Bible, there is something special about it, and alot of hard work went into it, i personally dont beleive there are corruptions in it, i would like to see some hard evidence for this though.
Like i said, good point, but it doesn't show the Bible is corrupt