Yeah i saw this on the news. My newsreader asserted "However, this is not likely to be used for humans, due to technicalities and ethics"
The question is, how vital are these "technicalities" to the inhibition of this practise being tested on humans?
The second issue of "ethics" doesnt really pose a question, society is degrading by the second, who knows whats deemed as ethically acceptable or socially tolerable when we wake up tommorow.
Please try to be respectful of God and to be reverent toward His Word, which is the Holy Bible.
Some may not be Christian nor agree with Christian theology in general, but please be respectful of those that do and to Christendom in general.
People from all walks of life and backgrounds of faith are welcome here, including the backslidden and nonbelievers, as well.
We may not all agree... but we can agree to disagree, at least.
However, any potential disagreements still need to remain civil in nature, and should stay as such.
Please, just debate the points of your position, if necessary, and refrain from ad hominem attacks. Slandering and name calling serve no productive purpose.
Posting rules are based upon decent conduct and generally acceptable chat behavior and, also, on Christian beliefs and morals found in the Holy Bible.
Please refrain from using offensive language or obscenely suggestive innuendo.
Usernames that are not becoming of basic common decency and morality are not to be used and may possibly result in membership cancellation.
Refusing to follow forum rules may result in membership cancellation and possibly some or all applicable posts being deleted and if necessary... entire threads.
If you feel these things to be unacceptable, please find another forum to post on.Thank you.