Science, Creation & EvolutionDarwin...did he recanttwohumble wrote:Non-Christian wrote:twohumble wrote:I asked for ONE fact that supports creationism and no one can do that. THAT IS THE POINT. There are no facts to support creationism. Doesn't that concern you? Doesn't the idea that the only proof you have is that some aspects of the theory of evolution can be debated? What does that tell you?
You refuse to acknowledge what I said? Read the book "Origins of Life" by Ross and Rana. They present quite a few "facts" for creation. All science falls into a realm of "reasonable probablility", there are very few "facts" that are totally and unequivocally proven, in science. Most "facts" are based on the most "reasonable and probable, based on the evidence at hand". If you want facts, read that book. Quid pro quo or tit for tat is useless diatribe. Educate yourself to the facts before you start slinging.
Have you read the book? Why not share what was so enlightening in it with us here? Your arguement is very weak here as you have now reduced your answer to my challenge with "read this book"...
Yes, I have, and I will not regurgitate it here, simply due to the complexity and detail needed to explain. It would be much better for you to read it, unless learning the truth is not your interest, and quid pro quo argument is your purpose.
I am not asking you to regurgitate it, I am asking you to restste ONE fact that you learned from reading it. If you can't do that, then why should I waste my time with it?
As far as the quid pro quo goes, I was asked to produce facts supporting evolution as an answer to my original question and I did not want this thread to change direction from my request.
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |