I was pretty sure black holes haven`t fully been explained yet. If they haven`t been explained then I don`t quite see how they rule out any laws.
Of course I`m not a physicist, I`ve been waiting for an explanation on black holes, do you have one? I haven`t read about them for a few years, if there has been a claim of explanation I really would like to see it.
Macro-evolution huh?
Before we talk about Macro-evolution, can I infer that you believe in Micro-evolution?
Do you understand that just the existance of micro-evolution makes Macro evolution possible?
LOL, I`ll just cut the to the quick. You can`t deny evidence of microevolution, and macroevolution is quite simply microevolution on a large scale. It`s a whole bunch of micro added together. There`s not really a huge difference here, and this is an arguement just for the sake of arguing.
If we put these terms to something called mathematics, and started saying micro an macro-addition. it would mean adding small numbers as opposed to adding large numbers.
Our proof of macroevolution is the "fossil record" No, there is absolutely no way to have a first hand study of billions of years of evolution if that is what you demand. The fossil record has been shown to be consistent with predictions regarding evolution. If you`re asking for a form of evidence that is impossible to have, like observed evolution over billions of years, then you already know it is impossible.
Perhaps my saying it has been observed was a little misleading, by observed I meant evidence observed within the fossil record, obviously not to be confused with first hand data.
Furthermore, Micro and macro-evolution don`t even seem to exist as terms within biological science. My research indicates these terms were created by creationists. I`m also seeing creationism more and more as a mechanism to create "reasonable doubt" in the minds of a gullible audience, with nonsense and often outright lies, it`s sickening.