Greetings H2O,
Thanks for your reply…
Quote:
And…pa-lease…don’t come off as making it appear like you had any knowledge whatsoever of classic Arabic lexicography before encountering me.
Actually when i choose my dictionaries they are not associated with the NOI nor the Ahmadiyyah movement. The Dictionary you are using is from the Ahmadiyyah of Lahore. Do you know how many muslims reject that dictionary. Rather than using him as a source of info they go to Edward Lane's Lexicon (Omar's source) instead which is recognized over all of them.
The reason why it I havent heard of the dictionary cause my source that I reference my dictionaries from do not recognize Abdul Mannan Omar the Son of the alleged propmissed Messiah as an authoritive dictionary of the Quran.
The Above is the pic of the so called promissed Messiah of the Jews Christians and Muslim by the Ahmadiyyah of Lahore the father of Abdul Mannan Omar
I have also read plenty of that sect's work and know the NOI follow their concepts, and Maulana Muhammad Ali' translation in which Abdul Mannan Omar followed after in his translation of the Quran.
These people are seen as HERITICS of islam, but you use a dictionary that has no authority among the majority of scholars of islam. That dictionary is based on the Ahmadiyyah's interpretation of the Quran which was rendered in thier translations. I didnt want to get into this with you until I got Edward Lanes Lexicon on CD so I can save it to an HTTP image and post it, I only have the hard cover and at the moment I dont have a scanner to save it as an Http Image.
I want to show you that how Abdul Mannan Omar only used words from Edward Lanes Lexicon on arabic roots that he only uses in his interpretive translation of the Quran in which He does not give all the root meanings in which Edward Lane list.
Translation:
Omar’s work is the very first Classic Arabic lexicon that you have ever owned. Period. End of story.
If you actually had a hard copy of Lane’s work, then you would have already quoted from him in support of your position.
As it is…..you are only quoting from Omar (the Lexicon of which you specifically told me to burn), which uses Lane as a primary source…
You now have no more lame excuses for eschewing my exegesis of Sura 86…
Again…..is this a Kodak moment or what…?
Take care…