Jovaro, have you taken the time to read anything other than evolutionist propaganda? What is fascinating about science is that true science is the search for truth, not the search for circumstances that support a myth.
You have not given rock hard evidence for evolution; you have appealed to evolutionists to support evolution. You have used modern mammals to support the evolutionary concept of birds evolving from reptiles. Mammals and birds are not in the same phylum.
tuppence has shown you based on what science can show today that 4.5 billion years is not enough time for a single cell animal to evolve into a worm, let alone a human being.
One question in the opening article had to do with why science can produce amino acids but science cannot create a living organism from those amino acids. If evolution is a viable theory then science should be able to start with nothing and create life.
tuppence's husband has shown you that the speed of light is not constant, so our concept of time is far from accurate. The vast majority of real science can demonstrate that this universe is young and that evolution is a fairy tale. Astronomy, microbiology, physics, and many (if not all scientific disciplines) point to a created universe with a master designer behind the plan. To ignore the evidence shows a lack of motivation to uncover the truth.
Your only response to real science is "given enough time". Well, given enough time 100 monkeys could probably type all of Shakespeares plays and sonnets on a computer, but you wouldn't be around to read them.