Science, Creation & Evolutionsubstitute biology teacherEvolution did not make mammals out of fish? That will be news to evolutionists! from http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/courses/bio20 ... natomy.htm (scroll down to the bottom) And this entire page is dedicated to the idea of the transformation of fish to mammal: http://www.humanorganic.org/HO/LSO/Huma ... orm2.shtml Here is a course dealing with the subject, which might be a little closer to home for you: http://cwisdb.cc.kuleuven.ac.be/oo-bin/ ... vaknr=G625 You want to get 'real scientific'? Read this article, of which the following is an exerpt: from here: http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/270/11/5839 In other words, Javaro, at least read up on what you are talking about before you start talking. I respectully suggest that it is you who does not know what evolution is about. Nor do you understand physics or chemistry. It seems to me that your mind has been so 'open' that uncountable garbage has been dropped in with no filter or discernment on your part at all! So it is rather useless to ask you how many generations it took for a fish to become a mammal. So I will answer it for you -- at the rate of known evolutionary changes, as exhibited in E.coli, yeast, and other single-celled organisms, fourteen billion years -- the estimated life of the universe -- is FAR too short a time for a fish to become a man! It does not matter if E.coli is our ancestor or not. That was not the point of the thing. The point of using them as an EXAMPLE, was that changes simply do not happen the way evolution proclaims and teaches that they do. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame