In the meantime, twohumble, here again is the original data on the speed of light research:
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html#3a
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html#3b
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html#3c (scroll down a bit for the table)
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html#3e
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html#3g
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html#3i
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html#t22
When Dolphin and Montgomery checked the statistical use of the data, here is what they used:
http://www.ldolphin.org/cdata.html
This note from Lambert Dolphin is on our website:
When Alan Montgomery and I originally decided to check Barry Setterfield's data on the speed of light in 1991 our interest was two-fold. Had Setterfield inadvertently erred in his mathematics?
Secondly, was there additional data he had missed that we could find and add in to the suite of available measurements on c? The entire exercise was very useful for our own edification. All said and done, we found that Barry was correct in his 1987 analysis and conclusions. Alan and I believe we have only confirmed and further strengthened his work so that it stands on even more solid ground.
Ten years later both Alan and I are eagerly waiting for someone to write us challenging our work and Barry's work before us.
Lambert Dolphin
June 2, 2003.
You see, despite all the flak that flies around, there has NEVER been a published refutation of the Dolphin-Montgomery article presenting verification of the Setterfield-Norman use of the data.
That is why I tell you I am interested in facts and data.
The websites I posted were simply to show you that this is a field under study. I do know there is an entire group or section of the Physics department at Mahatma Ghandi University in India dedicated to studying Barry's work. I do know that a group of physicists in the Baltics has asked for us to come and speak to them.
I do know that he is quite respected in some quarters.
But whatever happens, it is his desire, and mine, to ferret out the truth, not to impress anyone. If what he is doing helps others to know that the Bible can be trusted, that is enough.