Science, Creation & Evolutionsecular science and scientistsTuppence, I can see where you're coming from as far as not wanting to look at TO articles since even evolutionist have said that their articles are misleading. However, I also see why Helix and Jovaro are calling you a hypocrite. If you want to show a reason why TO should not be used, then show an evolutionist website that says TO is incorrect. A creationist website that says that has no meaning to an evolutionist, and it's hypocritical of you ("I won't listen to your evo website, but here, look at what my creo website says."). In like manner, the way to debunk a creo website is with other creo websites. Until any evidence is shown either way, then I suggest we go along as we've been going along for a while now - one side shows their argument along with links to a non-debunked (yet) website, and the other side finds faults with it and presents an alternative along with links to another non-debunked (yet) website. And remember, a website should remain at non-debunked status until another like-minded website debunks it (i.e. only evo websites can debunk evos, and only creo websites can debunk creos). |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame