Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussiontuppence wrote:OK, I'll start.
Something that irritates me about evolution apologists is the way they try to claim that the simple variation which is already found in the gene pool of a population can lead to the kind of changes which are NOT found in that gene pool -- changes which become, through some amount of time, the radical changes in body type and genetics which would cause a fish to become an amphibian or reptile, a reptile to become a bird, etc.
We all know variation exists, and no one is arguing it. The point of argument is where is the evidence which would lead us to think that it is even possible for one type or kind or organism (say, a fern) to change into another type of organism (maybe a pansy, or a pine tree?) entirely, regardless of the time taken?
What evidence is there that this kind of change is even possible?
You're automatically assuming microevolution has a cut off point. On what grounds do you base this on?
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |