Science, Creation & EvolutionInteresting discussion from Steven Jones on leaving theI concur. Science has never made faith a target for its own PR campaign, to think that is to ignore the many scientists who have a faith. If the community treats a certain movement with caution, it is not because it challenges the status quo nor is it because that side may be from a major religion. It is because their science is suspect and remains to be effectively shown. While it can be argued that anything that attacks well supported scientific principles will get more heat than less concrete theories, it does not mean more validity is given to the one who questions the current climate. In other words, I dislike the way some people suggest the science community is dismissing Creationism and ID as unscientific simply because of its background. Creationism relies on a supernatural event and entity that have no basis in reality thus far and Intelligent Design has merely hijacked science and added the questionable tag of whether all we see was the product of a sapient being and not physical forces (the latter again fails to address how this entity came into being and other notable features). |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame