Lord, just get to the EVIDENCE already!! :roll:
Joe, yes we get the point. Of course creationists have a socio-political agenda. Maybe evolutionists do too. Fine. I've seen that word repeated 50 times since you joined the threads.
Now show that you know what you are talking about by posting some creationist ID literature that claims to be equivalent to peer-reviewed scientific theories, and then REFUTE them.
Pointing out the socio-political agenda is an interesting sidebar, but it's still an Appeal to Motivation Fallacy. It doesn't in itself make the Creationists wrong.
In this case, the people here believe in Creation. Most probably don't have the full explanations harmonizing OR contradicting between the opposing theories. So since you are the person involved in science as a profession, AND you are here to show their belief in Creationism is wrong, then bring forth the assertions it gives and rebut them with your side.
That's all they are asking you. Stop harping on the motivation and get to the nitty-gritty.