Science, Creation & EvolutionThe Case for a CreatorEvilutionist wrote:Aineo wrote:Yet Joe Meert and his gang came to this board with the specific agenda of trashing ID and the scientists who support intelligent design as shown by current scientific discoveries. Therefore those who oppose science and scientists because of their faith are being hypocritical if those same people are not willing to address the atheistic and anti-religious agenda of others.
Hmm, I don't see that in any of the threads. I see a discussion regarding the motives of people who want to have evolution removed from textbooks. I also have to agree with the statement that ID is not science. Many ID proponents have agreed that ID is not science so religious motivations aside, what's the purpose of ID?
-E
You just made my point. What does ID have to do with science? The fact many scientists see intelligent design in our universe is not the issue, the issue is science and how to understand what science can actually demonstrate to be true. If you are going to critique Wells, Johnson, and Meyer based on their faith and refuse to critique Darwin based on his atheism then those who appeal to the Well, Johnson, Meyer, et. al. faith are in fact hypocrites who are avoiding science in favor of the atheistic agenda of the early proponents of Darwin’s theory.
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |