Joseph wrote:fdjohan wrote:We do NOT need your OWN interpretation. Because you are not the LEARNED one...Your interpretation is totally wrong and rejected
I highly doubt Apple Pie is out of sort from rejection. The only thing you have proven, some Quran translators maybe well-meaning but dishonest when it suits their agenda, but that's fine
Thalatha does not translate into Trinity nor does Three, even within context, come close to sense of the meaning. Yusef Ali, in probability, understood merely translating thalatha to three did little to improve problematic Quran inadequacy of identity of the Trinity. It is well known Mohammed was familiar with heretical Christians, who worshipped the Father, Son and Mary. And familiar with the heretical trithiest holding to existence of Three Beings. Quran never correctly identifies the Trinity. Perhaps this not a problem for you and other Muslims relying on learned ones, but from text claiming Divinity and "clear proof," it should be.
Another argument from me, surah Al-Ikhlas is TOTALLY rejects the concept of SON OF GOD.
Wrong. The Sonship
is not totally rejected by Quran, otherwise Muslims would create a contradiction in Quran: Which is OK by me. What is totally rejected (and Christians agree) is physical Sonship. This notion of an unholy union and God needs a wife to have a son, is what you and most Muslims have in mind. Islam's learned ones have built the universe around word begotten to mean only pro-created. However in no shape or form is spiritual sense of begotten (ibn-Allah) totally rejected.
Should you wish to discuss this further, I am ready.
joseph