Science, Creation & Evolutionjust some general logic
Fallacy: Shifting the burden of proof. You claimed Dawkins has endorsed "special relativity". I contend he has done no such thing. You are making the positive claim. You must support your claim. Do so in your next post or I will conclude you are unable / unwilling to do so.
I never claimed that. Please limit your rebuttals of my posts to arguments I've actually made. You "acceptance" of evolution is of no concern to me. Your claim that you understand evolution is demonstrably false.
This is a gross oversimplification akin to stating "First there was Mosses then there was Jesus" and ignoring all the events & individuals in between. Straw man. Transitional fossils, as I stated before, do not make or break evolution. You stated quite clearly there were none. I have proved your statement wrong. Transitional fossils + mutation + other evidence proves evolution. If you're going to use my link, be sure to READ it all. This link... http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-tra ... .html#gaps ... dispells completely your misconception and helps us understand why we see what we see with regards to fossils. Please. This "i know u are but what am i" reasoning is beneath you. Do not insult yourself by stooping to such tactics. It is Christians who appeal to assumptions ("god is real and made all this stuff") and ignore evolutionary biology (as you did a few paragraphs ago by evading the explantion of why the fossil record is the way it is). Parrotting your own defeated argument is a tactic worthy of the playground. If you're intereted in debate you're going to have to support your claims and take aim at arguments that have actually been made, not straw men. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame