Science, Creation & EvolutionMore Logic (Russels Teacup)First, repeating your assumption that Christians have to debunk evolutionary biology to justify their faith does prove evolutionary biology. Science can neither prove nor disprove a "creator". I addressed your remarks on the Ring Species thread. This sentence sums up the theory of evolution. You are self assured that a hoped for common ancestor will be found to substantiate your conviction of what has not been seen. The only thing the fossil record shows is that animals have become extinct due to changes in environment. As to the relevance of the Cornell site, it uses Lorenzian relativity, which disagrees with SR and GR, which take the dogmatic stance that nothing in the universe can exceed the speed of light. Why do you keep asking the same question over and over? Dating methods use "c", and since "c" is a defined constant not a measured number when "c" is proved to be a variable then the whole basis of evolutionary biology, which depends on "c" as a defined constant will suffer loss. You see if "c" has decayed by as much as 1010 times as theorized by Tifft (who is not an ID advocate or a creationist) then the universe is not billions of years old it is thousands of years old. Quantum physics and Lorentzian relativity are valid and accepted science. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame