No, I don't think you understand how evolution works. Let me give you some examples.
A giraffe has a long neck so it can reach the green leafs, high in the trees. Let's assume that many many years ago the necks of giraffe's were longer than most animals but not as long as now.
Giraffes didn't get longer necks during their lives, except from growing ofcourse. But when everything stops growing in a body, so does the neck.
Giraffes with the longest neck in the group could reach the best for leafs. They would have more food then giraffes with shorter necks and therefore be the fittest and live longest. (Survival of the fittest)
The best fed giraffes would be the most attractive to other giraffes (Natural Selection) Therefore the giraffes with the tendency for long necks, (something that is described in the genes) would have the most descandents who have a bigger talent for getting longer necks then other giraffes without those genes.
So in order for micro-evolution you have to have at least 2 animals of the same species with a different genome. No use mixing DNA if it is the same. Important is that DNA only changes when it is mixed with another when there is new breed. The only changes that take place during the lifetime of an animal (or human) or some minor mutations caused by outer influences, like radiation. If it would change during living it wouldn't make much of an identification method would it?
Good, so the basic needs are 2 of the same species with different DNA.
Now back to Adam and Eve. Eve was created out of the rib of Adam, so she must have had the same DNA as Adam. Given this fact, you can mix it as much as you want but it will never change...
So no change of view here from my side.