Thats very easy to answer. Omars work is based on the Ahmadiyyah of Lahores interpretation which is rejected by the majority of Muslims in general. Omar, the author of the Dictionary you host believes his father was the promiss messiah etc.
Edward Lane's work would be unbiased being that it is focus on Classical Arabic and the original meaning of Arabic words whom was free from dogmatic muslim sect veiws. Also, Edward Lane quotes by the way many Muslim Arabic Scholars as well in support of his renderings whom had no biblical or indoctrinated influences. His work was purely and unbiasely just to the best of his ability and knowledge.
Now why didnt I challenge you in your exegesis ? Cause it would have been a waist of time thats why. I decided to put Lane's to better use rather than to waist finger energy on you.
You said the Key words "you interpret the Quran with the Bible" if you were not indoctrinated by the Bible you would never had come up with such off the wall crazy exegesis that you had presented in the past. How could I challenge your exergeses when it is fueled by biblical indoctrination ?
Verily those who disbelieve, it is the same that you warn them or do not warn them they will not believe ? Allah has sealed a covering upon their hearts, and upon their hearing, and upon their perception and for them is a grievious punishment. (2:6,7)
Finally you go me to respond, but I think this is what you been trying to do the whole time. I couldnt resist this though its a faulty weekness I have when it comes to people like you.
ure