My goal is not to insult you or your husband, Tuppence. I've looked at the links you posted. You are right, he hardly mentions god in scientific explanations. And why would he? The bible does not mention lightspeed, redshift, the decay rate of radio active materials, etc. (But apparantly, does mention the 'stretching of the heavens.')
I apologise for writing the things you interpreted as accusations of 'sloppy science.' Your husband has not based any theories on the existence of a god and appears to make accurate and respectable points. He does refer to the bible to draw paralels, but not to explain things.
There is one important question that I have: How do you explain god? Do you or your husband have any theory on how he 'came to be'?
I myself have some trouble with the thought that the universe 'was just there' or 'started to expand out of nowhere', but the existence of a god needs the same questions: Was he just there, or did he come from somewhere? HOW did god originate, and how can we explain the powers the bible calims he has?
Any thoughts?