What makes you think you are the first person to post that link? As I posted above your whale example has been discussed before as have all the logical fallacies appealed to those who resort to such fallacies.
Tell me atheistthoughts, have you read all the research concerning the speed of light? For someone who likes to use the word "foolish", the fact you simply deny the speed of light has decayed as much as 1010 times reveals a lot about your agenda, which is not the advancement of any search for truth but the advancement of an agenda that is under fire by scientists with open minds who don't have any agenda other than the search for scientific truth. Evolutionary biology as well as all of what is currently accepted as scientific fact stands or falls by how c is defined. And the fact is the observed measurement of light speed is not constant.
I readily admit that the 1010 times reduction in light speed is still speculation, however if you read those articles I linked to it as well as others available on the Internet that do not simply defend the status quo there is a plethora of evidence that is as compelling as your evidence for evolution that the universe is far less than 14 billion years old and also not old enough to support the theories proposed and taught by evolutionary biology as scientific fact.
Now back to your link. Math is a method designed by men to explain what we know and what we theorize. You list includes in its parameters the conclusion you want to prove, which is why your list is simply begging the question and is why your list is a logical fallacy. You are not the only person on this message board that has taken logic courses or read books on logic, which at its roots is mathematics.