Science, Creation & EvolutionEvolution Cant Be FalseIt's a link to a math site. Usually, theological discussions don't require much math, unless you want to calculate the extremes of, say, some flood theories proposed by some creationists. May I ask where those discussions are on here so I can see? No, I have not. I thought I replied to that, but looking back, it seems I ignored it for some reason. I thought I asked where it was on those sites. I think I'm going insane. Anyway, I don't deny it as of yet, I just would like to see where it says 1010 times, since you didn't specify if it was in an old age or new age model. It seems rediculas for it to reduce 1010 times in 6,000 years, since the effects would make the universe so different that we would be able to tell in ancient accounts and in dating of rocks. Are you saying math is unreliable? It includes them because, if evolution wasn't in there, then it wouldn't be related to evolution. It is actually more of a prediction than anything. Evolution said that, since we have one less chromosome pair than our closest cousins, they must have been fused. Unsurprisingly, they are. Basically, what my proof shows is that, since they lok like they're fused, it is up to opponents to show why they aren't. And why doesn't include "God made it that way", since that doesn't tell us anything. Why means to say why God made it that way. As I have said before, there is no reason why God shouldn't tell you in prayer, since it would convert me, and I could probably convert others. That means less people will be hell, and God likes that. It's a win-win situation. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame