Well, that was an interesting post. However, since Aramaic and Hebrew predate Arabic by hundreds of years your appeal to Arab is ludicrous and demonstrates your ignorance of linguistics. The Bible was given to us in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Therefore your Arabic Bible is a translation that is probably no better than the English translations you have criticized. In fact your Arabic translation is most likely translated from the Peshitta, which is an Aramaic translation of the Hebrew and Greek.
Since this is not a Catholic/Orthodox message board your assumption we condone or advocate the use of images also demonstrates your ignorance of at least my posts. You see, if you had read my posts you would have read I do not believe that Jesus is God. The Bible does not teach Jesus is God. Also, I am well aware that one of God's names is Allah in Arabic, but His covenant name is Yaweh - not Allah.
Now if you want to debate the Qur'an then you can start with why the Qur'an tells Muslims that Jesus was not crucified, then tells you he was. You might also explain why Allah told Muhammad the Jews believe Ezra is the son of god when in fact they never have, or why Allah told Muhammad the Trinity is the Father, Son, and Mary instead of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
You might also like to explain why the Bible does not teach an eternal hell, sex in the afterlife, and that those who receive eternal life will not spend eternity in heaven but on a new earth created after God's judges those who reject His Messiah as their Lord, King, and High Priest but the Qur'an and Muslim tradition totally contradict what Allah claims are his words.
The Qur'an is a poorly written book of fiction that plagiarized Greek myths, Christian myths, and Arab pagan beliefs.
Now, if you want a debate all you have to do is respond to the above.