Aineo wrote:How about discussing the primary sources used in the Forbidden Letters instead of just appealing to those letters? I have shown how these letters are nothing more than an amalgamation of Animistic, Gnostic, Hindu, Egyptian/Chaldean mysticism, and I will add apocryphal Christian literature. A charge you have yet to refute.
The
Bible itself is an amalgam of Ugaritic, Chaldean Gnostic, an Egyptian sources.
All Religions are an amalgam, because it is so damn difficult to...
produce a religion from scratch.[Huntington]
The Nicean Creed is based in Greek philosophy not what the Bible teaches concerning God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit.
A Christ is there
who fought a serpent descending into e arth. That is pure alchemy. And the composers of the original Creed will have had reasons to communicate that detail in that Creed. And the Bible has been edited over and over. In plain english: you can't trust that book a bit. But that too isn't important. Important is the fact that we discover alchemy everywhere
once we understand the alchemical key.
Or have you limited your reading to Gnostic and pagan sources?
Alchemy is pagan. The religions are pagan. Everything is pagan. Christian, Muslim, Jew, those are just names to set yourself apart. There is only one nature and only one meta-nature (the living God). The alchemist. That
universal Creed is given by RFC with the following words [Edinger]
'The transformation of energy and the elixir of life refer to the Self, the ordering and unifying center of the total psyche, the central source of life energy, the foundation of our being, which is most simply described as God.' [Edward Edinger in Ego and Archetype/edited by RFC]
'This is intriguing, homosexuality being a requirement for apotheosis, since so little seems known about the cause of homosexuality.' This statement is false. When we consider all the studies and peer reviewed research we know more about the cause(s) of homosexuality than gay activists and there supporters are willing to admit. After all, even the icons of scientific research into the cause(s) of homosexuality agree that homosexuality is the result of biology, environment, and personality. There is absolutely no empirical scientific evidence that homosexuality is innate, or unchangeable.
I suggest you read Born Gay first before judging.
Your links lean heavily on The Lost Tomb of Jesus, which is a superficial analysis of 6 ossuaries found in a 1st century tomb
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic.php?t=8768 The Hebrew/Aramaic name Yeshua is translated Jesus only when it refers to one man, not every male named Yeshua.NT:2424
A tomb of Jesus. Good man, what
are you talking about? There has never even
been a man like Christ.
It seems your Forbidden Letters and those who defend this work of fiction cannot decide if Jesus was gay, bi, or straight.
The Forbidden Letters only say Jesus was fictional and created gay'ish to communicate the possible link between homosexuality and the forces of resurrection and thereby with paradise. We don't know whether that is true, but please study the letters and the articles
carefully before posting. So I don't have to clear up things all the time you could have cleared up yourself.
Best.
Davis.