ArchivedThe Bible is accurateLet me clear the Muslim perspective about the bible: This is not the subject here carol. Again this is not the subject here. To make the point clearer and how you the correct reasoning: First the gospel writers depended on account witnesses, secondly if they were inspired by God to write them and had the holy spirit supporting them, at least they would come with identical stories through a different language style or perspective. For example, none of the gospels really agree on what Jesus said before he died or you can check the examples about Peter denying Jesus or the story of people hearing or not hearing the voices, we see that they did not describe the same event identically in which shows two things : 1) they depended on account witnesses 2) not inspired by God since they never agree on so many occasions on alot of events. In other words, it would be common sense for them not to have identical texts but it would matter if they disagreed on FACTS that happened in Jesus's life for example. This response : "it doesn't matter what matters is the doctrine" has always been the typical answer to avoid answering such questions about the NT. Do you know that the Gospels were chosen out of 24,000 documents? do you trust the people who made the decision on which gospels to choose? would they not choose the ones that fits their doctrine?Did you know that they all had to be greece and no Hebrew one was to be chosen? Did you know about all those sects who believed in Jesus as a prophet just like all the other prophets. Recently new documents were discovered in Syria of a sect believed in Jesus as a prophet who never died on the cross, and those documents dated 40 years after the ascension of Jesus. If you can't prove that the bible isn't accurate then it is basically isn't, running away from the asnwer and saying all what matters is the doctrine would not be the coorect answer. Thanks |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame