Christian/Muslim ThreadsThe Quran is fabricated and corruptedProofs, proofs, proofs... I need proofs. Not (language removed by newseed) and personal speculations. And one more thing: If your logic is right: Then for example Passion Narrative were wriiten around 30-60 which means before any Christian heresies contained today in the fictitous NT. Why were these writings rejected? Please backup your claims with authenticated proofs and not (language removed by newseed). And Apocrypha are also contained in your book today: The Abingdon Bible Commentary1 (pg. 1076) readily admits they have no idea where the story of the woman caught in adultery (reported in John 8:3-7) came from, saying; “It is certain that this story does not belong to this gospel. It breaks the continuity of 7:52 and 8:12; the style and language are Synoptic and not Johannine. The textual evidence is against its authenticity as part of the Gospel.” Jesus stoning the adulteress woman in the Christian NIV (New International Version) Study Bible says: The earliest and most reliable manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have John 7:53-8:11 The Living Bible admits “most ancient manuscripts omit John 7:53-8:1-8:11.” As Jade Koay wrote: “It is widely known and acknowledged that the whole incident thingy about ‘Jesus’ saying the words ‘he who is without sin cast the first stone’ never happened...In fact it was added to our bibles...Even my bible, right down at the bottom is footnoted as saying that this incident never appeared in the majority of ancient texts...” The Abingdon Bible Commentary 1 (pg. 1020-21), explaining Chapter 16 of Mark says; “The Resurrection (1-8) in Mark’s Gospel broke off suddenly at v.8 or it may be that the original ending became lost. At a later period, efforts were made to complete or restore it.” “The codex Washington adds after verse 14 in Mark’s Gospel, a crude paragraph―which has been taken from some early second century Christians writing. In some extant MSS. of the Gospel of Mark, another shorter ending has been added as well.” One last point – The Abingdon Bible Commentary (pg. 953) agrees with Christian scholars that Mark was the first gospel as it says; “One of the assured results of devout criticism is that almost the whole of Mark is incorporated in ‘Matthew.’ This conclusion can be verified by any student who cares to examine in a synopsis a parable or incident which is found in both Matthew and Mark. This discovery indicates that the author was not one of the twelve, for one who had been an eyewitness himself would not report to the work of a secondary witness.” Christians should no doubt be referred to as sheeple since they act like sheep. This is why their leaders are called shepherds. The sheep, like Christians, blindly go wherever their leaders tell them. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame