My point is that, contrary to your statements, this is a field under study.
That was the purpose of the last list.
Have you read ANY of the other links posted above that?
This discussion is getting ridiculous. It seems you are doing anything and everything to avoid the data itself.
Let me know if you change your mind about that approach.
In the meantime, this thread was not about this at all to begin with.
twohumble LOOK AT THE DATA