Aineo, it would be remiss of me to say it, but what force do you see in barely half a thousand scientists who "doubt" evolution and yet have no firm basis in which to doubt it and publish in their respective scientific fields?
Surely, if such a group was as powerful and ever growing as some would have us believe, then evolution would truly be a theory in crisis. I assure you, it is not. The scientific community has not, nor will it in the near future without some extraordinary evidence, remove the theory of evolution from the textbooks used today and primary papers. Additionally, a doubter does not mean one finds the whole theory inappropriate, but maybe has more to add or a variation of the theme. As you pointed out, doubters are also not Creationists by default, this is a common black and white fallacy used in debates.