Aineo seems to be fond of double standards. He has on occasion been quite rude and condescending to others here, but cries when others return his language in kind. Looks like he never heard of the Golden Rule, i.e.
He misspelled my name twice, then b*tched when I accidentally typoed his
He referred to me twice as a woman, so I admit the 'girlfriend' remark was done to bring attention to his insulting comments.
OK, I'll let all that pass - let's ALL stay on topic
Here we find him STILL harping on the blind spot and cameras. For the last time, digital cameras ARE NOT designed like human eyes. They combine a mammalian-like lens arrangement (front end) with a cephalopod-like photosensor and wiring (back end). They use the BEST features of BOTH systems and DISCARD the sub-optimal ones (like wiring that causes a blind spot).
Aineo. I'll ask you for the fourth time - why would an all knowing Intelligent Designer come up with DIFFERENT eye designs, with the each have merely adequate but sub-optimal features? Science has quite a bit of evidence that explains how different vision systems evolved - You and the ID crowd have NONE - certainly you've presented none here.
You have shown zero interest in educating yourself on this topic despite being presented with detailed scientific data and research results. Instead, you continue to choose to base your arguments on ignorance and snide remarks. You DO realize that there are many lurkers watching your debacle, and seeing just how weak your position is. For that, I guess I should thank you. You are one of the best arguments illustrating the dangers of scientific illiteracy I could hope for.
Tiggy