Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussionThen you agree that scientist do not blindly accept whatever is put in front of them Yes, but by far the majority of biologists agree that evolution has given us the variety of life we see today through common ancestry. And what you don't seem to understand is that we no longer think of evolution as 'Darwins' theory' or 'Darwinism'. Believe it or not things have changed in the last 150 years... So, yes, I am skeptical of Darwin's theory myself. But I am certain of evolution. Well, some parts of the theory are intact. Did those scientists also sign a statement that common ancestry is false? I didn't see that anywhere in the statement... Hmm, you have effectively evaded the point of this statement which is that there is a fairly complete lineage from land to sea mammals. A biologist could help you here. My guess is that the ancestor to mammals was an early dinosaur-like creature. Whether it was a reptile I am not very certain. Becuase that's the way engineers do it? Your point is silly. Natural selection is by definition natural. Why do YECs fail to see that a natural process can have ordered outcomes? By the way, I have made an attempt to answer every one of you questions. Why do you ignore mine? Do you think that is very respectful? |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame