Your arguments are not worth the time to refute, since you are appealing to philosophical concepts imported into Christianty by pagan Greeks as well as a translation that is less than credible. You are also ignoring the overwhelming Biblical evidence that the Tinity is a doctrine based on the traditions of men.
You Catholics appeal to your ECF's, but only when it is convenient since their "holy traditions" cannot be found in Scripture. However, when we appeal to your ECF's you ignore what is found on Catholic sites, which includes how not all your ECF's quoted "Father, Son, and Holy Spirit" in Matthew 28:19. Some of them used the phase "in Jesus name", just as all other references to baptism are referred to from Acts forward.
Your arguments are superficial and revolve around just two verses, which ignores all the OT and NT Scripture that can be used to disprove your less than profound explanation.
And like I have posted before the fact the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father who is spirit does not establish the Holy Spirit is a seperate and distinct person any more than your spirit is a seperate and distinct person.