Science, Creation & EvolutionbacteriaOh! So it has been done! But you know, artificial selection in this manner would be identical to evolution, save the fact that it is artificial. The result would still be a gain in genetic information, only it would be genetic information humans find usefull in horses; not nature. So long as there wasn't splicing involved (and we still can't realy do that well anyway), I don't see how you could say this isn't evidence for evolution. Though, of course, you might say, maybe evolution is possible, but we've only been around six-thousand years anyway, so there hasn't been any. Might you say this? |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame