ArchivedCONTRADICTIONS IN THE QURANPeace, Alpha, the theory of Human evolution is not a fact, it’s just a theory because it has missing links, so what you saw of the “proof” in the Natural History, is of no concern to me. However, what is certain is that your bible commentators do not have proof that it was Mark who wrote the Bible, and just with that doubt, I cannot accept Bible to be the word of God. So your telling me that you would base your entire faith on a doubtful Gospel? Talk about blind following! It’s quite easy to verify the authenticity of the Qur’an. Can we say the same about your Holy Books? So produce your evidence of the so called violence in the Qur’an, I will explain them to you. Concerning, the cults, Jesus promises you that if you are a Christian believer that you shall speak foreign tongues, that if you drink poison it shall not harm and that “they will pick up snakes with their hands”. You can’t really blame those poor people for thinking that they are true Christians and for relying on God to fulfil his promise. You can’t apply this rule to a word of a God. There should be no doubt when it comes to religion, because if you are wrong there are grave consequences. We are not talking about Sciences here, Science can be doubtful because if you’re wrong it doesn’t matter. Can you say the same about religion? Once you die, you can’t come back again and correct yourself. You have to absolutely sure, and certain that it was Mark that wrote "his" Gospel. In religion there is no doubt! And where shall I bring my proof from? You want me to bring it from the Qur’an or to produce it from a doubtful Gospel? The first question that should be asked is, is the Bible authentic? Is it completely reliable or does it contain doubtful material? Your Bible commentators have answered that for you. So tell me what is the point of extracting information and evidence from a source that’s unreliable? The reason I say this is because doubt leads to questions. Now since there is not internal evidence that Mark actually wrote the Gospel attributed to him, it leave us three options: (1)He didn’t write the Gospel (2)He wrote some of it, and others have added to it (3)He could have written it. What I am saying is that, a Book presumedly from God should not be doubted about its authors. But since your own Bible scholars can’t produce the evidence of it’s authenticity, I can’t believe it to be the Word of God. I said doubtful because that’s what your bible commentator said. Now because they said they are unsure, I will disregard the entire bible because God is not the author of unreliable sources “And remember ye said: "O Moses! we cannot endure one kind of food (always); so beseech thy Lord for us to produce for us of what the earth groweth, -its pot-herbs, and cucumbers, Its garlic, lentils, and onions." He said: "Will ye exchange the better for the worse? Go ye down to any town, and ye shall find what ye want!" They were covered with humiliation and misery; they drew on themselves the wrath of Allah. This because they went on rejecting the Signs of Allah and slaying His Messengers without just cause. This because they rebelled and went on transgressing.” ( 2;61 ) So as you can see Alpha, God does not keep a covenant with the sinners who continuously after been forgiven, are ungrateful and sin again. In reality, it is not God who broke the covenant but it was the Jews. God did no such thing. See it’s you and your Bible that is saying that, and whether that such a statement actually is from God is debatable.. See it is Islam that offers the better option. We say that God never allowed Jesus to be crucified and that if you seek forgiveness, ask Him directly. What I suggest you do, is stop hiding behind Jesus, and face reality. Peace and Blessings be to the Believers |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame