Science, Creation & EvolutionWas Darwin Wrong?WOW, it took me a while, but I read the entire text. Yes and no. YES it is a reasoning that can be carried on eternally: Natural selection selects those that are fittest, the fittest are those that survive. Then who is selected? The fittest. And who is that? The one that doesn't die. It IS a circular reasoning and no point is made about WHAT exactly IS the fittest. So who are 'the fittest'? The fittest are simpy those that reproduce most. I have often said on this forum that 'the one who is adapted to its environment' is the fittest, but this doesn't always hold up. The one that reproduces most often is the fittest: His genes will be more widely spread thoughout the genepool.* We see very often that those individuals who are most adapted to their environment (e.g.: those that catch most prey, or those that can spot more ripe fruit or those that have some way of NOT getting eating before sex begins -like in spiders- ) have a greater change of getting their genes into the next generation. Natural selection seems to keep the good traits, because they are more widely spread throughout the genepool and are prevalent in more individuals. I have mentioned fusion within a star (like our sun) before. It is a self-sustaining process (like life for that matter). It takes nuclear fusion to produce nuclear fusion. FACT. Because this is a circular reasoning, does this mean fusion does not exist in stars? *The collective genetic information contained within a population of sexually reproducing organisms. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame