Science, Creation & EvolutionSudden appearance of phyla in the Cambrian explosionThat's called an ad-hominem argument and is really quite detrimental to discussion. Do you consider nuclear weapons to benefit mankind? One can more easily attach more direct negative consequences to QM and relativity than evolution. Only for some. Scientifically speaking, evolution merely tells me that I am the product of a long line of starts and stops. It does not cause me any deep psychological or theological trauma. It might help if you could explain why a scientific theory troubles your soul so deeply? Then why not object to QM as Einstein did? It's basically a roll of the dice argument. Nonsense. Science cannot have a conscience/concious because it is a thing. Scientists can and do have a conscience. Nonsense, that's what science is all about, questioning. You confuse a lack of explanation with 'no hope for any explanation'. They are two different things. Given that we know that life evolves, it's not a stretch to look to evolutionary biology to explain that which we still have not solved. To the best of my knowledge, few biologists doubt whether or not the CE is the result of evolution, they just don't have an explanation for how it happened. As you yourself acknowledged (through silence), there is no other compelling explanation for the CE. -E |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame