Science, Creation & EvolutionSudden appearance of phyla in the Cambrian explosionFalse. I'm merely commenting on what I consider to be scientific. I'm perfectly happy to discuss issues not in scientific journals such as ID, faith etc. You're making false accusations as to what I will and will not discuss. I post for a number of reasons. I post a mix of facts (usually referenced), opinion (clearly stated as such) and questions. You are free to disagree, disregard or dispose of any posts you don't like. Ok good post. Would an intelligent designer include failure into all the designs as well or is this merely the product of an imperfect designer? Correct Philosophy can pervert anything. Science can be filtered through Wicca, politics, religion or just about any filter you want. The good thing about science is that it can be independently tested no matter ones philosophy. Exactly and that's why it's important to note that good science is accepted independently of ones personal philosophy. Then you've been reading too much into my posts. Science is about teaching what we do and don't know and the evidence that leads to answers and questions. I think I've been quite clear on that. My 'agenda' is to carry on a lively conversation and debate specifics of evolutionary science and outline what I perceive as the main weaknesses of its critics. -E |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame