Oh, your quick! You replied during a small edit.
My point is that CHANGE does not equal natural EVOLUTION. Look at quids/octopusses for example: Some variations (like the nautilus) have not or hardly changed for hundreds of millions of years (and is still in its ancestoral form nowadays), while belemnites, ammonites, primitve and modern quids as well as hundreds of species of octopus have evolved from the same ancestor.
Physical appearance has nothing to do with evolution: It's a by-product of the natural process known as 'natural selection', where the crappy variations die and the more successful variations survive. And as long as male and female genes are combined in children, evolution will continue.
In conclusion: 'No change at all' fits in very well with the theory of evolution by means of natural selection.