Would you care to rethink your response? Hamer set out to prove a point and in order to get the results he desired performed sloppy science.
If you could provide evidence thathe did this, and m,ore importantly, a specific case
Evolution is not independent of intelligent design or what you posted is illogical. You cannot have the evolution of all life from a single cell and evidence for intelligent design. In fact until science can explain the origins of life macroevolution is simply speculation.
You make a leap in logic. We have seen macroevolution in the entirety of the fossil record as well as the little fact that thesame processes that drive microevolution also drive macroevolution. It is simply a matter of accumulated change. Unless you want to say there is some sort of magical wall that prevents accumulation of allele frequency change after a certain amount.
And how is there intelligent design in environment replication?
BTW, I did not state that applying Boyles law and praying are one in the same. However, for those who understand the power of pray and apply the power of prayer, prayer is just as real as Boyles law.
Tell that to the little children that die every year because their parents refuse them medical care, prefering to pray for their recovery from cancer
If you want to confirm a result that you found, you better hope and expect for that same result or something similar to it when the experiment is runned again. Adding to Aineo's example of Hamer, the famous Greek Philosopher Zeno thought that man moving from one point to another was just an illusion, because when recursion is applied, there is an infinite amount of steps which one makes. What Zeno did not know that we do today is the convergence of infinite series. Zeno is an example of one who had faith in something which was later proven false. Many scientists today (if not all) hold to a belief which is not proven.
Keyword, Philosopher, not scientist. DO I need to go over the difference bewtween a physicist and a metaphysicist?