BISMILLAHIRRAHMAANIRRAHIIM
=====================
Here come the tafsir of Apple Pie about suran 103 verse 2.
For verse 1, A misterious man picked Revelation 14:12-20 and put it in Al-Qur'an
For verse 2, That misterious man step back to verse 14:8-11
I just wonder why that misterious man not start from 14:8-11 and then 14:12-20 . hmmm... how weird
After a long journey of exegesis, Apple Pie translated:
103.2 Certainly the human is in punishment for sin.
Is that the real message of surah 103:2?
Then What's that verse got to do with :
8 A second angel followed and said, "Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great, which made all the nations drink the maddening wine of her adulteries."
9 A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: "If anyone worships the beast and his image and receives his mark on the forehead or on the hand,
10 he, too, will drink of the wine of God's fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. He will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb.
11 And the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. There is no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and his image, or for anyone who receives the mark of his name."
12 This calls for patient endurance on the part of the saints who obey God's commandments and remain faithful to Jesus.
How come those 5 verses squeezed into one short verse:
103.2 Certainly the human is in punishment for sin.
Can you tell me what is the relation of surah 1 and 2 Apple Pie?
103.1 And/by the time during which peoples pass away and become extinct.
103.2 Certainly the human is in punishment for sin.
Summary of 103.2:
• Revelation, from the same chapter fourteen, describes the fall of Babylon (i.e. the city of man)
• This fall of mankind is due to “the wine of the anger of her fornication she made all nations to drink”
• Revelation also warns against worshiping the beast and its image which will result in “basanizo”, or torment
• 103.2 links to 103.1 via the corroborative particle “inna”, or certainly
• What is certain is in relation to “al-insana”, or mankind, and is equated to the winepress of God (i.e. Jesus), as described in 103.1
Wrong. God in Al-Qur'an is clearly ALLAH. Jesus as Son of God is rejected
• Mankind is used in conjunction with the genitive “fee”
• 103.2 utilizes the word “khusrin”, which is best described as “punishment for sin”, and is the possession of the “fee” of “al-insana”
How do you judge BEST and NOT BEST?
How come you judge BEST when you know the first verse is clear talking about ASHR.
The word "LOSS" can be the best because it connected to TIME.
Loss; a loosing concern. It comes from the root “khasira”, which means he lost, or suffered loss or diminution: or he was deceived, cheated, beguiled, or circumvented
You will loss, if don't give any respect to TIME.
This word is related also to verse 3.
• This “punishment for sin” is the “torment” as described in the Book of Revelation
•
Let's see your exegesis for verse 3. I wanna see if this one is related to it.
Observe that this punishment involves fire and brimstone, lasts forever, and takes place in the presence of the Lamb(i.e. Jesus)
This is nothing to do for the first verse.
There is no such teaching for Jesus as GOD or SON of god. Rejected.
That's the prove that there is no a so called "DICTATED".
You keep on pushing to the edge of logical tinking Apple Pie.