Science, Creation & Evolutionjust some general logic As another example, in debate the burden of proof is placed on the affirmative team. As a final example, in most cases the burden of proof rests on those who claim something exists (such as Bigfoot, psychic powers, universals, and sense data).
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacie ... proof.html
However: Following the theory of special relativity, the answer is that the news could not, under any circumstances whatever, have reached more that one-fiftieth of the way across one galaxy — not one- thousandth of the way to our nearest neighboring galaxy in the 100-million-galaxy-strong universe. The universe at large couldn't possibly be anything other than indifferent to Christ, his birth, his passion, and his death. Even such momentous news as the origin of life on Earth could have traveled only across our little local cluster of galaxies. Yet so ancient was that event on our earthly time-scale that, if you span its age with your open arms, the whole of human history, the whole of human culture, would fall in the dust from your fingertip at a single stroke of a nail file.
http://www.thehumanist.org/humanist/art ... wkins.html
Just because I do not accept evolutionary biology does not mean I do not understand evolutionary biology.
I never claimed that. Please limit your rebuttals of my posts to arguments I've actually made.
You have demonstrated gross misunderstandings of evolution. Thus, the above statement is false / unevidenced.
You need to read your own posts.
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |