twohumble wrote:
Kyas, in your first post, you only touched on a few genre of plants, and your explanation did NOT encompass all plant life, by ANY stretch. Most trees, and non-flowering plants (grasses) that do not reproduce by germination do NOT follow your earlier post.
So tell me…
twohumble wrote:
Your explanation of sexual reproduction of monerans is misleading in that you proffer sexual reproduction as an example of pairs.
Don’t deny that it is possible. And I also explained the asexual part as well.
twohumble wrote:
Let me explain to you that asexual reproduction requires no pairs and is another viable way they reproduce. Your response included this explanation, but you decided to add a personal commentary implying that amino acid base pairs in DNA would qualify for "pair's" for the definition that "all things were created in pairs". Amino acids are NOT living things, so the fact that they pair up A/C T/G is irrelevent. DNA pairs do NOT mean that asexual reproducing bacteria need pairs. THEY DON"T.
How can DNA not relevant? It is one of the tiniest thing on earth…
without DNA can the bacteria live? NO…
without DNA can the bacteria reproduce? NO…
The verse read:
And of every thing We have created pairs: That ye may receive instruction. ( 51:49 )
As Naaji and I agreed on, the ‘thing’ mentioned is not only for living thing.
twohumble wrote:
As I read your posts, I must assume you are not as scientific literate as I supposed, since you are really reaching here on trying to justify everything having pairs. By the way, you never mentioned virus's.
Sorry, I did not realize that. I never said that i know everything about science. One thing i would like to remind you is that the verse does not say "every living thing need pairs to reproduce"... what i can see about virus is it cannot reproduce by itself... it needs a living cell... and act as parasite... without the living cell virus cannot reproduce...